Internal handoff ยท Metropolitan Council proposal

Why The 3D Art Numbers Differ By $1.08M

The workbook currently contains two valid-looking art figures that answer different questions. They are not yet reconciled.

Short Handoff Statement

The detailed Estimator itemizes all currently modeled 3D-art work at $2,289,686. The buyer-facing Cost tab carries only $1,212,216 in its five direct route/vehicle art rows. The $1,077,470 difference is not confirmed savings; it is art scope omitted from, or reallocated outside, those five rows. Before reducing the proposal price, the team must either place these assets elsewhere in the Cost tab or explicitly remove their scope and update both sheets.

Detailed Estimator
$2,289,686
All listed train and route 3D modeling
Cost-Tab Art Rows
$1,212,216
Five buyer-facing route/vehicle rows
Unreconciled Gap
$1,077,470
Not an approved reduction
Art scope behind the gapCurrent estimator value
Mid/far-field environment across 50 miles$537,485
40 mid-field points of interest / landmarks$284,992
29 miles of near-field route-extension geometry$206,619
Low-fidelity train-car shell set$26,874
S70-versus-S700 visual differences$21,499
Parent-row rounding reconciliation$1
Total unreconciled art scope$1,077,470
Required decision: Keep and reallocate each line, reduce its quantity/fidelity, or remove it with matching scope language. Do not simply subtract $1.08M while leaving the promised environment unchanged.